Category Archives: Democrats

We Are the Guardrail

The men who wrote the Constitution, ratified 238 years ago, had a lot on their minds. There had never before been a complete, written national constitution anywhere. They were not sure a government which derived its authority from the people it governed could succeed. Some would have gladly declared George Washington King of the United States were he willing to accept the position.

Some feared the people were not qualified to govern. They believed there was a natural ruling class who should be in charge. Some wanted a strong central government. Others wanted power to remain with the individual states, as it had been since the revolution twelve years earlier.

The result was a document in many ways a revolution itself, describing a government of the people, but one purposedly designed to contain the compromise, confusion, and purposeful ambiguity that reflected the debate between the authors. With the addition of 27 amendments, it has survived all this time.

For those who slept through civics class, the Constitution separated the central government into three branches, the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. Each had a list of powers. Each had a method of checking the operation of the other two branches. There were important omissions. Items on which the authors could not agree and so left for future generations to sort out. But it has held together for all these years. That says something.

What the authors feared most was that power would corrupt. That malevolent leaders would destroy the nation in search of personal advantage. This was John Adams’ nightmare. In my lifetime, I have never seen anything as corrupt as the current administration. Nor have I found one this corrupt in my study of American history. I mean corrupt not just in a monetary sense, although the avarice of Donald Trump and his family is astounding. I mean also corrupt in what Trump has done to the institutions of government and the rule of law.

That one man could be so misguided is not surprising, although the fact that 77 million voters cast their ballots for him in 2024 is. What is surprising is the degree to which the checks and balances have collapsed. The guardrails have failed.

This is due to the abdication on the part of the legislative branch, which has ceased to provide any meaningful oversight of the executive, failed to enforce its decisions on taxation and spending, and consented to the appointment of some of the most unqualified and actually destructive individuals to positions of power throughout government. There have been 306 calendar days in the year to date. The House of Representatives has been in session for 133 of them. Nice work if you can get it.

The judicial branch has not just abandoned its responsibilities. It has openly ceded its authority to the executive branch. While many lower court judges have blocked Trump’s unlawful excesses, the conservative majority on the Supreme Court has more often than not knocked down those guardrails, allowing Trump to proceed with his executive power grab. With those actions, the Court has greatly tipped the balance of power in the government, allowing for an autocracy at the helm.

The outlook is bleak. But there is one last hope.

We are that hope. We, the people. We, the voters, have now an opportunity to change the direction of the nation. But only if we get off our rears and go out and vote. In the United States, voter turnout for true “off-year” elections (held in odd-numbered years for local and municipal offices) typically falls between 25% and 40% of eligible voters. There are indications this year the turnout will be much greater.

That is a good sign. If you are happy with the way things are going, by all means go out and vote Republican, ensuring that Trump will be unfettered in the next two year. But if you are unhappy with the current state of affairs, vote for Democrats who will raise the guardrails. They will not have the power to reverse the current state of affairs. That decision comes in 2028. But Democratic majorities in Congress will slow down the Trump onslaught and place a spotlight on the abuses of the administration.

We are the final guardrail.

#####

This is How It Should Be

This is a great picture in these troubled times. All four of the living former Presidents of the United States, and First Ladies, gathering in Chicago for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center. It was an uplifting event, full of hope and optimism for the future of a country about to celebrate the 250th anniversary of its birth. The only downside was that we found ourselves noting how remarkable it was. This is how it should be.

Read more

John Roberts is …

John Roberts is displeased. John Roberts is exasperated. John Roberts is frustrated. John Roberts is annoyed. John Roberts is irked. John Roberts is any other of the many synonyms my thesaurus suggested instead of the word I originally used, which it found to be “vulgar.”

What has the Chief Justice of the United States in high dudgeon (I thought of that one myself) is the reaction to the Court’s recent decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which drove a stake through the heart of the only section of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 the Court had not previously decimated. With the vote falling along party lines, many critics condemned the decision as racist and political.

Read more

The Donnie-Mander

The Supreme Court, or rather the six Republican justices on the Supreme Court, have handed Donald Trump another victory. They issued a stay, blocking the order of a three-judge panel in Texas, which found the recent reapportionment of the state’s Congressional districts to be racially motivated and therefor illegal. The six, has been their pattern all year, issued their order in the dark of night on the “shadow” docket without an explanation or opinion. Greg Abbott, et al. v. League of United Latin American Citizens, et al.

The map the lower court panel blocked was seen as one of the most aggressive mid‑decade gerrymanders in recent history. The Supreme Court stay allows Texas to proceed with the new map, which analysts say could give Republicans five additional U.S. House seats in the 2026 midterms.

Gerrymandering 101

What, in a nutshell, is gerrymandering? The Encyclopedia Britannica has a wonderful explanation from which I have borrowed the graphic above. The American Constitution requires that every ten years we conduct a “census” to apportion representation in the House of Representatives. The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 2 begins, “Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.”

Once the number of representatives is determined by the census, it is up to each state to draw the maps of legislative districts. Because the states have statewide elections for senators, governors, and to decide members of the Electoral College, there is data on how the state as a whole divides between the parties. Using the graphic above we find of a total population of fifty, thirty (60%) are orange voters while twenty (40%) are purple voters.

From that starting point, the state could draw “fair” maps which distributed the people in such a manner to generate three orange and two purple representatives, proportionate to the statewide electorate. But the state could also gerrymander, producing an outcome, using the example on the right above, of five orange and no purple representatives, or two orange and three purple representatives.

The term “gerrymander” was coined as a portmanteau of the name Elbridge Gerry and the word “salamander.” Gerry, who was the governor of Massachusetts, signed a redistricting law that redrew district lines in a way that favored his party. Critics said the new map created a weirdly shaped district which resembled a salamander. A satirical cartoon published in the Boston Gazette on March 26, 1812, popularized the word. The cartoon depicting the irregular shape helped turn a local political attack into a lasting political term.

The Donnie-Mander

The political parties have a long history of manipulating their maps to various degrees every ten years when the new census requires a reallocation of seats. But two things make this year’s manipulations unusual. First, this is a mid-census reapportionment. The last census was in 2020 with new maps taking effect in 2022 in most states. Second, this mid-census revision to the 2022 map came at the direct demand of Donald Trump. Texas’s Republican Governor Greg Abbott heeded Trump’s call and generated a new map that may add as many as five Republicans to the House in 2026. That is the map the Supreme Court now says can be put into place. With the Republican control in the House hanging on a tiny seven vote majority, Trump is clearly afraid the Democrats could gain control in the next election.

This Trump inspired Donnie-Mander, now sanctified by the Supreme Court, has set off an unprecedented arms race of mid-decade redistricting across the country. Missouri and North Carolina have passed their own Republican leaning maps. California voters approved a map designed to cancel out the Texas gains. Virginia and Maryland are working on new maps favoring Democrats. Illinois is considering one. Florida and Indiana are working on revisions on the Republican side.

National Public Radio has been keeping score on its web site. As of this writing they show a slight gain for Republicans on the basis of district voting patterns in next year’s election. Considering his atrocious polling numbers, Trump is going to need all the help he can get. The Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, one of my favorite pollsters, sees 2026 shaping up to be much too close to call.

Congress has over the years tried to set standards and take control of the redistricting process. It has never been able to pass a law to bring order out of the chaos.

The majority on the Supreme Court, by allowing these partisan mid-decade redistrictings, has created a free-for-all which is a lose-lose for the American people. But 2026 does promise to be a good show.

######

Trump’s Victory

Democrats thought they had a good issue. They’d pass still another continuing resolution to reopen the government in return for an agreement from Republicans to extend special subsidies for insurance policies bought through the Affordable Care Act. They misjudged the willingness of Donald Trump to continue his war on America by inflicting more pain on the American people. Cut food assistance for more than forty million Americans? Sure. Cripple the air traffic system by requiring controllers to work without pay? Of course. Furlough hundreds of thousands of federal workers and threaten to penalize them by not restoring their wages when they return to work. No problem.

Democrats underestimated Trump’s need to inflict pain. He loves it. He gets off on it. Nothing massages his massive ego more than enjoying a luxury party at his Florida home while people can’t buy food. If they can’t get groceries, let them eat cake. The ACA is also known as Obamacare. Trump hates Obamacare. A doubling or tripling of premium rates for Obamacare insurance policies just gives Trump more ammunition to attack the program. Trump has been trying to kill Obamacare for decades. He insists he will replace it with something better. He never produces a new plan. His supporters don’t seem to mind. So, Trump would not give in to the Democrats no matter what.

Read more

No Kings

Anywhere from five to eight million people turned out for the second “No Kings” protests across the nation. The rallies took place in over 2,600 locations across the United States.

I have first or secondhand knowledge of protests in New York, Washington D.C., Chicago, Portland, San Francisco, and Los Angeles. They were peaceful. Crowds were almost jubilant at having an opportunity to voice their opposition to the actions of the Trump administration. The only place I heard Trump supporters showed up to counter the protest was Palo Alto, California. No Kings protesters refused to engage with the Trumpies, who they feared were trying to provoke them.

Read more

R.I.P. – D.O.J.

A former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation has been indicted on the direct order of the President of the United States.

Let that sink in. I’m sure that this thing happens all the time in Russia. Or China. Or North Korea. Or Iran. But I can’t think of anything comparable ever happening in the United States of America.

Read more
« Older Entries