Knowing When to Leave

UPDATE AUGUST 30, 2023

On August 30, after this column was written, Mitch McConnell froze again. This time he was addressing reporters in his home state of Kentucky. The incident was recorded on video. It is long past time something was done about this problem. Just as the 25th Amendment to the Constitution was added to deal with the possibility of presidential incapacity, something must be done for members of Congress either by amendment or by changes in the House and Senate rules.

As I wrote back on August 13th, both Senators McConnell, a Republican, and Feinstein, a Democrat, should be allowed to retire gracefully now, with provisions made to fill the committee and leadership positions which will become vacant in a way which maintains the partisan balance. What is the purpose of waiting until one or both are carried out of the Capitol on a stretcher, leaving a crippled Senate behind?


Original Post from August 13

Knowing when to leave may be the smartest thing that anyone can learn. No truer words were ever spoken. Or written as a song lyric, in this case by Hal David and set to music by Burt Bacharach for the 1969 musical Promises Promises. It is a lesson few politicians ever learn.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell suddenly stopped speaking during a weekly Republican leadership news conference on July 26, 2023, appearing to freeze, and then went silent and was walked away. McConnell had been making his opening remarks about an annual defense policy bill when he stopped talking. He was led away from the press conference and towards his office by fellow GOP Sen. John Barrasso. A brief time later, McConnell returned and told reporters that he was “fine.”

It certainly didn’t look fine. It looked frightening. Keep in mind that this is the long serving Senate Republican leader. The man most responsible for decades of right-wing judges being appointed throughout the federal courts. The man who once bragged that his desk was the place liberal legislation passed by a Democratic majority House of Representatives went to die. But while I would cheer if McConnell were defeated in his next election, I do not wish him poor health.

McConnell is not alone. California Senator Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, is showing obvious signs of cognitive decline, leaving her colleagues in Congress scrambling for ways to work around her. She spent months at home in California reportedly suffering from shingles. She returned to the Senate in a wheelchair, but she has been seen in committee meetings apparently confused as to the state of the proceedings and unsure of her vote. That incident occurred during a meeting of the Appropriations Committee. Feinstein also sits on the Judiciary Committee which considers pending appointments to the federal bench. It is sad to watch.

Feinstein is currently the oldest member of the Senate, at 90 years of age. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa will be ninety next month. Grassley is the senior Republican on the Judiciary Committee and has been a key player blocking the appointment of judges he believes are too liberal. Grassley, who won reelection in 2022, has had his share of incoherent moments in public as well. Feinstein has announced she will retire when her term ends at the end of 2024. There have been calls for her to resign now, allowing California Governor Gavin Newsome to name someone to serve the remainder of Feinstein’s term.

The arcane rules of the Senate appear to make it impossible to change committee memberships during any session of Congress without a filibuster proof majority of sixty votes. Republicans have already said they will not cooperate. That would cost Democrats their one vote majority on the Judiciary Committee, which approves the nominations of all federal judges.

Neither McConnell nor Grassley have discussed retirement.

This problem is not limited to members of Congress. Republicans love to attack 80-year-old President Joe Biden, the oldest man to serve in the White House. But Donald Trump, at 77 years, isn’t far behind. And unlike Biden, who regularly rides a bicycle, Trump requires a golf cart on the links and looks like he is one cheeseburger away from a coronary. Neither man is ready to retire.

It takes a special kind of person to put the public interest ahead of their own ambition and, perhaps, vanity. It’s worth considering the cases of Supreme Court Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer. Justice Ginsburg died in 2020 at the age of eighty-seven, while still serving on the court. While her dedication to the job is admirable, her decision not to retire earlier, despite her age and health issues, she had several surgeries for cancer, changed the balance of power on the Court. The overturning of Roe v. Wade was a direct result.

In contrast, Justice Breyer, who is currently 85 years old, retired in 2022, even though he is apparently in good health. That decision has been praised by many as a wise move, allowing President Biden to appoint a replacement while the Democrats held the Senate majority.

As someone who now has a Medicare card in his pocket, even though I am some distance away from the ages of the people I noted above, I am the last to imply that one should be automatically disqualified from public office, or from doing any job, simply because of age. But we must all make an honest assessment as to our ability to perform in whatever role we undertake. This is certainly most true in the public sector. A public official unable to perform their duties is not doing anyone any good. The key is knowing when to leave.

#####

Trump Threat du jour

(There is an update below)

I really did not want to write about Donald Trump again so soon. I hate the way Trump dominates the news. I hate the way he steals our attention when we should be facing up to our challenges. I hate the way he sucks all the oxygen out of a room when his name is just mentioned. But Trump loves the attention, and he won’t stop attracting it. The danger our democracy faces from Trump is so great it is incumbent on anyone who values truth to speak out.

Trump was arraigned on Thursday, August 3rd, on four federal felony counts arising out of his action to retain his office even though he had lost his bid for reelection. He pled not guilty, and he was allowed to leave on what is known as a personal appearance bond. That bond doesn’t require that a defendant put up any money unless they violate the terms of the release or fail to show up in court.

Read more

The One That Counts

Donald Trump‘s dance card is filling up. Trump has now been indicted by a third grand jury, this time for his actions following the 2020 election. Trump is accused of attempting to stop the peaceful transfer of power and deny the right of American citizens to elect their president. There has never been anything like this in the history of the United States. The outcome will determine what kind of a nation we want to be.

This is the Case that Counts

In a series of investigations, two previous indictments, two impeachments, and several civil lawsuits, Trump has been accused of crimes committed as president and after he left office. The charges range from business fraud to the illegal retention of classified material to the destruction of evidence.

Read more

The Supremes: The Gods Themselves

Supreme Court Building, exterior

Following its tradition of recent years, the Supreme Court of the United States spent the last few weeks of June releasing its most controversial decisions of the term. It then adjourned for its usual three-month vacation. This is the last of a series of posts analyzing those decisions.


As is their habit, the reporters who cover the Supreme Court of the United States wrote summarizing the court’s decisions for the term that ended in of June. Some surprised me in concluding that this term was less traumatic than the last. Those of that view concluded that the Court was mindful of the decline in public respect for the institution that followed the 2022 decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health, overturning the fifty-year-old precedent holding that women had the right to control matters of their own reproductive health.

It is true, the decisions of the term just ended avoided the use of the term “overruled” the conservative supermajority applied with such glee in Dobbs. But I see little to cheer in their recent work. They have continued to erode at rights Americans have taken for granted. And they do with without regard for precedent, without deference to the elected branches, and without consideration for the principle that their jurisprudence be as limited as possible. Instead, they have set themselves up as the most powerful branch of government, the final arbiters of the most fundamental elements of our social intercourse. We have entered the age of SCOTUS uber alles.

Read more

The Supremes: Student Debt

Supreme Court Building, exterior

Following its tradition of recent years, the Supreme Court of the United States spent the last few weeks of June releasing its most controversial decisions of the term. It then adjourned for its usual three-month vacation. This is part of a series of posts analyzing those decisions.


On the last day of the term the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Biden v. Nebraska that the Biden administration’s student loan forgiveness plan was unconstitutional. The plan, which would have forgiven up to $20,000 in student debt for borrowers with incomes below $125,000, was based on the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act (HEROES Act), a 2003 law that allows the government to provide relief to recipients of student loans during a national emergency.

Read more

The Supremes: LGBTQ

Embed from Getty Images
Supreme Court Building, exterior

Following its tradition of recent years, the Supreme Court of the United States spent the last few weeks of June releasing its most controversial decisions of the term. It then adjourned for its usual three-month vacation. This is part of a series of posts analyzing those decisions.


The Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority did not end its assault on precedent with its new rules on abortion last term and affirmative action in the term just ended. In the eight years since the court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the right to marry is a fundamental right guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment the surviving dissenters in that case, Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Chief Justice John Roberts have been plotting revenge. Thomas, in his concurrence to last year’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health opinion stripping American women of their reproductive rights explicitly invited a fresh challenge to Obergefell.

Read more

The Supremes: Affirmative Action

Supreme Court Building, exterior

Following its tradition of recent years, the Supreme Court of the United States spent the last few weeks of June releasing its most controversial decisions of the term. It then adjourned for its usual three-month vacation. This is the first of a series of posts analyzing those decisions.


Continuing its steady march back to the 19th Century, the conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court has effectively ended affirmative action on the basis of race in college admissions, a policy used for more than 40 years to make campuses more diverse. The two schools at the center of this decision, Harvard, America’s oldest private university, and the University of North Carolina, the oldest public one, had programs considered the gold standard in affirmative action plans.

Read more
« Older Entries Recent Entries »